PolicyChanges tracks payer policy changes for medical practices and tells you what to do before they take effect.

Create a free accountPolicy Monitoring is free. No card required.
← Back to list
AetnaAll Plans · Coverage · Medical Policy · Cardiology, Cardiothoracic SurgeryMedium impact

Percutaneous Mitral Valve and Tricuspid Valve Repair (CPB 0880, reviewed 2026-08-25)

Effective date
Not stated in the notice
Identified
Sep 30, 2026

Summary

Aetna considers transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with an FDA-approved device, such as the MitraClip NTR/XTR Clip Delivery System, medically necessary for chronic mitral regurgitation that remains symptomatic despite maximal doses of medical therapy in members with symptomatic severe primary mitral regurgitation who are not considered good candidates for mitral valve surgery, or with symptomatic severe secondary mitral regurgitation who have a left ventricular ejection fraction between 20% and 50%, a left ventricular end-systolic diameter of 70 mm or less, and a pulmonary artery systolic pressure of 70 mmHg or less. Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement with an FDA-approved device, such as the Edwards-Sapien 3 valve, is considered medically necessary for symptomatic failing surgical bioprosthetic mitral valves when a heart team including a cardiac surgeon judges the member to be at high or greater risk for open surgical therapy, meaning a predicted risk of surgical mortality of 8% or higher at 30 days. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the TriClip device is considered medically necessary for severe tricuspid regurgitation with symptomatic heart failure when all listed criteria are met, while caval valve implantation, transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement, and trans-apical mitral valve repair are considered experimental, investigational, or unproven.

Get alerts when payers change rules like this one

We check Aetna and other payers every day and email you when a change matches your specialty and state.

Get Aetna alertsPolicy Monitoring is free. No card required.

What to do

Action · 3 steps
01Claims for MitraClip repair need documentation that the member has symptomatic chronic mitral regurgitation that remains symptomatic despite maximal doses of medical therapy and meets either the severe primary mitral regurgitation criterion, not considered a good candidate for mitral valve surgery, or the severe secondary mitral regurgitation criteria of a left ventricular ejection fraction between 20% and 50%, a left ventricular end-systolic diameter of 70 mm or less, and a pulmonary artery systolic pressure of 70 mmHg or less.
02Claims for mitral valve-in-valve replacement need documentation of a heart team judgment, including a cardiac surgeon, that the member is at high or greater risk for open surgical therapy.
03Claims for TriClip tricuspid repair need documentation that all listed criteria are met, including intermediate or high surgical risk, at least 30 days on maximal goal-directed medical therapy, and a left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 35%.

Codes mentioned

3341833419333408277783006I05.0I05.1I05.2I08.0I08.1I08.2I08.3I36.1I38I01.1I21.4R57.0

Original notice

Percutaneous Mitral Valve and Tricuspid Valve Repair (CPB 0880, reviewed 2026-08-25)
aetna.com · Always check the source before changing claims.
View original ↗

Related policy hubs

Summaries are AI-assisted. Always confirm against the original payer notice.

What is PolicyChanges

One workspace for payer rules, prior auth, coding and compliance

Medical practices use PolicyChanges to catch payer changes before they cause denials. Every change is summarized in plain English, with the codes involved, the date it takes effect and what to do.

Start freePolicy Monitoring is free. No card required.
Get alerts for changes like thisPolicy Monitoring is free. No card required.Create a free account