PolicyChanges tracks payer policy changes for medical practices and tells you what to do before they take effect.

Create a free accountPolicy Monitoring is free. No card required.
← Back to list
AetnaAll Plans · Coverage · Medical Policy · Ophthalmology, ENT (Ear, Nose & Throat)Medium impact

Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: Treatments (CPB 0420, reviewed 2026-07-07)

Effective date
Not stated in the notice
Identified
Aug 17, 2026

Summary

Aetna considers nasolacrimal duct probing medically necessary for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. It considers balloon dacryocystoplasty medically necessary for a mucocele of the lacrimal sac, chronic dacryocystitis or conjunctivitis due to lacrimal sac obstruction, congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction that cannot be cured by probing (members over 1 year of age), epiphora due to acquired obstruction within the nasolacrimal sac and duct, and lacrimal sac infection that must be relieved before intra-ocular surgery. Dacryocystorhinostomy, including transcanalicular laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy, is medically necessary for persistent symptoms despite nasolacrimal duct probing, and conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy is medically necessary for significant anatomic abnormalities proximal to the lacrimal sac that conventional procedures cannot address.

Get alerts when payers change rules like this one

We check Aetna and other payers every day and email you when a change matches your specialty and state.

Get Aetna alertsPolicy Monitoring is free. No card required.

What to do

Action · 5 steps
01Billing team: bill nasolacrimal duct probing and balloon dacryocystoplasty only when the selection criteria in the policy are met, and confirm the diagnosis matches one of the listed indications.
02Balloon dacryocystoplasty for all other indications, including anatomic malformations in the lacrimal duct or bony lacrimal canal, dacryocystolithiasis, recurrent episodes of active dacryocystitis, sarcoidosis, tumor of the lacrimal sac, Wegener granulomatosis, and other specific acquired obstructions, is considered experimental, investigational, or unproven.
03The use of silicone stenting in balloon dacryocystoplasty is also considered experimental, investigational, or unproven, and silicone stenting is not covered under CPT 68815.
04Combined endoscopic membranous nasolacrimal duct resection with retrograde lacrimal stent placement, simultaneous reconstruction of medial canthus deformity with micro-anchors, inferior turbinate fracture for congenital obstruction, and osteopathic manipulation for congenital obstruction are considered experimental, investigational, or unproven.
05CPT codes 98925 to 98929 and 30930 are not covered for the indications listed in the policy, and ICD-10 code H02.89 is not covered for the medial canthus deformity indication.

Codes mentioned

687206881068811688156881668745687506880131239309309892598929A4262A4263H04.221H04.229H04.301H04.339H04.431H04.439H04.531H04.539H04.551H04.559Q10.4Q10.5Q10.6H02.89

Original notice

Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: Treatments (CPB 0420, reviewed 2026-07-07)
aetna.com · Always check the source before changing claims.
View original ↗

Related policy hubs

Summaries are AI-assisted. Always confirm against the original payer notice.

What is PolicyChanges

One workspace for payer rules, prior auth, coding and compliance

Medical practices use PolicyChanges to catch payer changes before they cause denials. Every change is summarized in plain English, with the codes involved, the date it takes effect and what to do.

Start freePolicy Monitoring is free. No card required.
Get alerts for changes like thisPolicy Monitoring is free. No card required.Create a free account